A.P. NAYAR vs REHA.MIN.EMP.COOP HOUSE BLDG.SOC.LTD — C.A. No. 7105/1999

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010084131999

Filing Date

15-May-1999

Registration No

C.A. No. 7105/1999

Diary Number

8413/1999

Order Date

24-Apr-2006

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.P. NAYAR

    Adv. H. S. PARIHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REHA.MIN.EMP.COOP HOUSE BLDG.SOC.LTD

    Adv. V. K. VERMA RACHANA SRIVASTAVA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2006

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 20-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 31-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 15-May-1999

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7105/1999

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.P. Nayar v. Reha. Min. Emp. Coop. House Bldg. Soc. Ltd The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court's decision that the disputed land (Khasra No. 167) in Village Begampur, Delhi was lawfully acquired by the Government under the Resettlement of Displaced Persons (Land Acquisition) Act, 1948, and subsequently allotted to the Rehabilitation Ministry Employees Cooperative Housing Society on perpetual lease. The Court found that the appellants' predecessor, Gopal Dass, purchased the land in 1955 after acquisition proceedings were already complete (award passed in 1962), thereby acquiring only a right to compensation—not title or possession. The Court rejected appellants' belated challenge (filed in 1979) to a 1959 separation order and confirmed the Society's possession of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case