LIFE LINE INDIA INSURANCE MARETING SERVICE LTD. vs MAHENDRA SADASHIV AROLKAR — Crl.A. No. 433 - 437/2012
Case under Section II-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010084082010
Filing Date
15-Mar-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 433 - 437/2012
Diary Number
8408/2010
Order Date
15-Dec-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LIFE LINE INDIA INSURANCE MARETING SERVICE LTD.
Adv. K. N. RAI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
MAHENDRA SADASHIV AROLKAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-Dec-2021 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 14-Dec-2021 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 06-Oct-2021 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 29-Sep-2021 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 01-Oct-2020 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 000433-000437/2012 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of the appeals by directing Lifeline India Insurance Marketing Services Ltd. and its directors to deposit Rs.23,090 and Rs.1,56,355 respectively before the magistrate court within four weeks. Upon receipt of these deposits plus amounts already deposited with the Supreme Court, the magistrate was directed to release the entire amount to complainant Mahendra Sadashiv Arolkar and close all related summary cases. Key Facts: The case involved criminal complaints for dishonored cheques under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 417 and 420 of IPC filed in 2004. The sessions judge had discharged the director-accused, but the High Court reversed this, holding that as cheque signatories and company management, the directors remained liable. Next Steps: The magistrate court must release funds to the complainant and dispatch a report to the Supreme Court upon case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts