RAJESH VERMA . vs UNION OF INDIA . — Crl.A. No. 961 - 962/2013

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010083722012

Filing Date

12-Mar-2012

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 961 - 962/2013

Diary Number

8372/2012

Order Date

16-Jul-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH VERMA .

    Adv. NIKHIL JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 15-Feb-2013
  8. 13-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 31-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Jan-2013
  11. 04-Jan-2013
  12. 29-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 31-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 30-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 26-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 30-Aug-2012
  20. 07-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 10-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 11-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 08-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 30-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 30-Mar-2012
  26. 26-Mar-2012
  27. 20-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 20-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 20-Mar-2012
  30. 20-Mar-2012
  31. 12-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 961 - 962/2013

  32. 27-Feb-2012
  33. 06-Feb-2012
  34. 31-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 24-Jan-2012
  36. 17-Jan-2012
  37. 16-Dec-2011
  38. 12-Dec-2011
  39. 08-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 16-Nov-2011
  41. 01-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 06-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 14-Jul-2011
  44. 14-Mar-2011
  45. 02-Mar-2011
  46. 18-Feb-2011
  47. 08-Feb-2011
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 000961-000962/2013 (Rajesh Verma v. Union of India) This Supreme Court case dealt with the validity and executability of preventive detention orders passed under the COFEPOSA Act, 1974 (Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act), consolidated with multiple related writ petitions and appeals. Key Issues The Court addressed whether detention orders that remained unexecuted for several years (ranging from 3-16 years) could be challenged and quashed on grounds including: (1) absence of "live nexus" between the detention order and current circumstances, (2) long delay in execution, and (3) whether detention orders could be challenged beyond the five exceptions established in *Alka Subhash Gadia's case*. Outcome Split Decision (3 judges, divergent views): 1. Chief Justice Altamas Kabir (majority position): Allowed the writ petitions and appeals, quashing detention orders that became stale and lost their live nexus with their purpose due to long periods of non-execution, particularly where no evidence showed the proposed detainees continued prejudicial activities. 2. Justice Gyan Sudha Misra & Justice Chelameswar (dissenting): Dismissed all matters, holding that detention orders should not be quashed merely due to passage of time, especially when detainees evaded arrest or challenged orders at pre-execution stage. They reasoned that the grounds of detention should be served and examined on merit rather than quashed on account of delay alone. Next Steps Matters were directed for service of detention orders and grounds to proposed detainees, allowing them to file representations or seek further legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case