THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE vs RAMVEER SINGH — Crl.A. No. 575/2014
Case under 1511Comp-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(matters Filed by the State Government/ Complainant Against Acquittals or Reduction of Sentence.) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010082922012
Filing Date
12-Mar-2012
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 575/2014
Diary Number
8292/2012
Order Date
30-Jul-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2025 INSC 952
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE
Adv. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMVEER SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Jul-2025
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
-
07-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 575/2014
-
[ 2025 INSC 952 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramveer Singh Court Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal, upholding Ramveer Singh's acquittal. The Court found the prosecution case riddled with contradictions and held the dying declaration—the prosecution's primary evidence—unreliable due to the victim's critical condition (100% burns, unmeasurable vitals, barely audible voice). Key Reasoning: Both lower courts had disbelieved the eyewitness account. Critical infirmities in the dying declaration included the victim's precarious physical state making coherent narration virtually impossible, difficulty deciphering her dialect, and the officer's admission that he had to bend down to hear her barely audible speech. The Court applied the established principle that acquittals can only be overturned when guilt is the sole possible view; here, multiple reasonable interpretations existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts