FARIDABAD COMPLEX ADMN. vs INDICATION INSTRUMENTS — C.A. No. 6197 - 6199/1995
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010082761995
Filing Date
12-Jul-1995
Registration No
C.A. No. 6197 - 6199/1995
Diary Number
8276/1995
Order Date
09-Apr-2002
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FARIDABAD COMPLEX ADMN.
Adv. HEMANTIKA WAHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDICATION INSTRUMENTS
Adv. PRAMOD B. AGARWALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-1995
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6197 - 6199/1995
Summary of C.A. No. 006197-006199 / 1995 On April 9, 2002, the Supreme Court dismissed Faridabad Complex Administration's appeals with costs. The dispute concerned whether imported component parts (copper capillary tubes, bourdon tubes, speed cables, etc.) used in manufacturing dashboard instruments fell under Entry 76 of the Octroi Schedule. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that these spare parts do not constitute "goods" under Entry 76, which applies only to scientific, mathematical, optical, surgical, or dental goods—not component parts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts