STATE OF UTTARANCHAL vs M/S. GOLDEN FOREST CO. (P) LTD. — C.A. No. 3195/2011

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010082372006

Filing Date

28-Mar-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 3195/2011

Diary Number

8237/2006

Order Date

10-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

    Adv. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. GOLDEN FOREST CO. (P) LTD.

    Adv. SHAILENDRA BHARDWAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Apr-2011

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Sep-2010
  7. 28-Apr-2010
  8. 05-Apr-2010
  9. 25-Feb-2010
  10. 22-Feb-2010
  11. 17-Feb-2010
  12. 09-Feb-2010
  13. 29-Jan-2010
  14. 16-Dec-2009
  15. 23-Nov-2009
  16. 21-Oct-2009
  17. 04-Sep-2009
  18. 29-Jul-2009
  19. 10-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 13-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 09-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 29-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 01-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 09-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 09-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 27-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 07-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 31-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 28-Mar-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3195/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Uttaranchal v. M/S. Golden Forest Co. (P) Ltd. Outcome & Direction: On March 10, 2014, the Supreme Court modified its April 11, 2011 order in I.A. No. 3 of 2014. The Court directed that the Committee it had appointed to oversee Golden Forest Co. (P) Ltd.'s affairs must be heard by the Board of Revenue while deciding the company's pending revision applications (R.O.R. Nos. 10-16 of 2011) in accordance with law. The Court clarified it expressed no opinion on the merits of the parties' cases before the Board. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case