KAMLAWATI YADAV . vs SATISH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA . — C.A. No. 1115/2012
Case under Section III-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010081742004
Filing Date
13-Apr-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 1115/2012
Diary Number
8174/2004
Order Date
18-Jul-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMLAWATI YADAV .
Adv. NAGARKATTI KARTIK UDAY[P-3] NAGARKATTI KARTIK UDAY[P-2] NAGARKATTI KARTIK UDAY[P-1]
Respondent(s)
SATISH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA .
Adv. HARISH PANDEY[R-6] HARISH PANDEY[R-5] HARISH PANDEY[R-4] HARISH PANDEY[R-3] HARISH PANDEY[R-2] HARISH PANDEY[R-1] MANJULA GUPTA[R-7] [Pr]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-Jul-2019 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 17-Jul-2019 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 16-Jul-2019 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 02-Apr-2019 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 07-Feb-2019 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Summary: The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal by directing the school management to pay salaries to the appellants (ad-hoc Assistant Teachers appointed in 1988), who had been working without compensation since 1991. While the Court noted it could not direct the Government to pay salaries due to the unapproved ad-hoc nature of the appointments, it held the school institution liable for salary payment given the appellants' continuous service. The appeal was disposed of on July 18, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts