ASHOK vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 897/2014
Case under Section II-A. Status: Sclsc Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010081432013
Filing Date
08-Mar-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 897/2014
Diary Number
8143/2013
Order Date
11-Feb-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK
Adv. MANIKA TRIPATHY[P-1] [SCLSC]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. SACHIN PATIL[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
06-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
05-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
30-Jan-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
05-Jun-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jun-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
31-May-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
30-May-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 897/2014
The Supreme Court dismissed Ashok's criminal appeal but directed that his case be considered for remission under applicable norms, given that he had already served fourteen years in custody and met the minimum sentence requirement. The court noted insufficient contemporaneous medical evidence regarding his mental fitness at the time of the incident and directed the authorities to consider his subsequent mental health in custody as a mitigating factor, with the remission process to be completed within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts