SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND — Crl.A. No. 1630/2026

Case under 1503Ab-criminal Law : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Lokayukta Act of Different States(slps Arising Out of Anticipatory Bail Applications) Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010081062026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1630/2026

Diary Number

8106/2026

Order Date

25-Mar-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1503AB-Criminal Law : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Lokayukta Act of different States(SLPs arising out of Anticipatory Bail applications) Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. SHUCHI SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

    Adv. PALLAVI LANGAR[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1630/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court allowed two criminal appeals on March 25, 2026, granting bail relief to appellants Sudhir Kumar Singh and Vijay Pratap Singh in corruption cases involving alleged embezzlement and forgery charges. Singh was granted anticipatory bail with Rs. 25,000 cash security and two sureties, while Singh was directed to be released on bail by the trial court with conditions including passport deposit and cooperation in proceedings. Both appellants must refrain from witness interference or tampering with evidence, with liberty reserved for the State to seek bail cancellation upon breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case