M/S SRD NUTRIENTS(P) LTD. vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE — C.A. No. 9294/2012

Case under Indirect Taxation : Central Excise Act, Central Excise Tariff Act Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010080862012

Filing Date

12-Mar-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 9294/2012

Diary Number

8086/2012

Order Date

23-Jul-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Central Excise Act, Central Excise Tariff Act Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SRD NUTRIENTS(P) LTD.

    Adv. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Adv. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Jul-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Jul-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  4. 11-Jun-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 30-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9294/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 009294/2012 M/S SRD NUTRIENTS(P) LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE The Supreme Court dismissed SRD Nutrients' appeal challenging a Central Excise demand of Rs. 35,31,810 for excess refund under modified Notification No. 33/99-CE. The Court rejected the company's argument that the Revenue should have adjusted the demand against its available CENVAT credit of Rs. 98,38,935 without a formal request, holding that while Section 11 permits such adjustment, there is no statutory obligation to do so. On interest liability, the Court upheld that interest must be calculated under Section 153(4) of the Finance Act, 2003, chargeable from June 14, 2003 at 15% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case