ARVIND WALIA vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT — Crl.A. No. 1564/2026

Case under 1509Misc-criminal Law : Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002(Slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge,summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation/re-investigation, Etc.) Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010080552026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1564/2026

Diary Number

8055/2026

Order Date

23-Mar-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1509MISC-Criminal Law : Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002(SLPs arising out of quashing applications, orders framing charge,summoning orders, interim orders in criminal matters withdrawal of prosecution, orders for further investigation/re-investigation, etc.) Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND WALIA

    Adv. MALAK MANISH BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1] ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1564/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court granted bail to Arvind Walia, a 65-year-old real estate promoter arrested by the Enforcement Directorate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, for allegedly defrauding homebuyers. The Court held that Section 45 of PMLA cannot justify indefinite detention and found no necessity to continue his custody since he had voluntarily appeared before ED on five occasions and spent over 8 months in jail. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bail bonds, attending trial proceedings, and prohibitions against tampering with witnesses, with trial court authorized to cancel bail for any breach of conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case