KAPURI BAI vs OMPRAKASH DUBEY — C.A. No. 624/2015
Case under Benami Transaction Act : Benami Transaction Act Section IV. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010079552012
Filing Date
03-Mar-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 624/2015
Diary Number
7955/2012
Order Date
21-Aug-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAPURI BAI
Adv. NAMITA CHOUDHARY CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI[P-1] NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-2] NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-3]
Respondent(s)
-
1.OMPRAKASH DUBEY
Adv. DINESH KUMAR GARG P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-3]
Case History
-
21-Aug-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar
-
08-Sep-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2021
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari
-
24-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2021
IA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta
-
23-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 624/2015
On 21-08-2023, Justice Sanjay Kumar heard Civil Appeal No. 624/2015 (Kapuri Bai v. Omprakash Dubey) and dismissed seven interlocutory applications. IA No. 45689/2020 was dismissed as withdrawn at the respondent's counsel's request. IAs 72430, 72444, 72434, 72475, 72470, and 72449 of 2020 were dismissed as withdrawn after the appellant's counsel objected to their maintainability, citing lack of proper authorization for other counsel to represent appellants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts