SHYAM SUNDER EKNORIA vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — SLP(Crl) No. 6336/2026

Case under 1501Misc-criminal Law : Offences Against Women, Including Sexual Offences, Harassment, Domestic Violence, Dowry, Trafficking Etc.(slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge, Summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters, Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation, Re-investigation Etc.) Section II. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010079252026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 6336/2026

Diary Number

7925/2026

Order Date

26-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1501MISC-Criminal Law : Offences against women, including sexual offences, harassment, domestic violence, dowry, trafficking etc.(SLPs arising out of quashing applications, orders framing charge, summoning orders, interim orders in criminal matters, withdrawal of prosecution, orders for further investigation, re-investigation etc.) Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAM SUNDER EKNORIA

    Adv. PUNEET SINGH BINDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

    Adv. SUDEEP KUMAR[R-1]

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 26-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  3. 20-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 6336/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner Shyam Sunder Eknoria's application for exemption from filing official translation and condoned the delay in filing. The Court issued notice returnable on 20.05.2026 and granted an interim stay on further proceedings in Sessions Case No. 92 of 2024 (Crime No. 369 of 2019, P.S. Amroha Nagar, District Amroha). Petitioner's counsel argued that the High Court's observations regarding prior criminal antecedents were factually incorrect and that this is a case of a relationship turned sour between parties in a 5-year relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case