HAZARI LAL ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. — C.A. No. 3728 - 3730/2014
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010078762012
Filing Date
02-Mar-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 3728 - 3730/2014
Diary Number
7876/2012
Order Date
27-Feb-2014
Document Type
ROP
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HAZARI LAL ETC. ETC.
Adv. MOMOTA DEVI OINAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Feb-2014
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2014
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jan-2014
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jan-2014
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jan-2014
ROPView PDF
-
06-Dec-2013
ROPView PDF
-
22-Nov-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Oct-2013
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
27-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
01-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
02-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
12-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
20-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
05-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
29-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
10-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3728 - 3730/2014
-
02-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
01-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
05-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
On 27/02/2014, the Supreme Court heard the SLP filed by Ram Gopal & Ors. against the State of Haryana, challenging a 2010 High Court judgment. The Court condoned the delay in filing process fee and spare copies, and directed the office to issue notice to respondents No.1 and 2 accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts