K. SATHYANATHAN vs <font color='red'>C.K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR</font> — Crl.A. No. 1084/2014

Case under 1503Two-criminal Law : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Lokayukta Act of Different States(cases Where Sentence Upto 2 Years Imprisonment Is Imposed Including Fine Only) Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010078122012

Filing Date

02-Mar-2012

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1084/2014

Diary Number

7812/2012

Order Date

09-Oct-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

1503TWO-Criminal Law : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Lokayukta Act of different States(Cases where sentence upto 2 years imprisonment is imposed including fine only) Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K. SATHYANATHAN

    Adv. SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C.K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR

    Adv. HARSHAD V. HAMEED[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Oct-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Oct-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  4. 28-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 27-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1084/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001084/2014 K. Sathyanathan v. The State of Kerala & Ors. The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal as "not pressed" on October 9, 2025. Appellant K. Sathyanathan's counsel informed the Court that the appellant had completed serving the sentence imposed by the trial court and upheld by the appellate court, and that the appellant instructed him to discontinue the appeal. The Court accordingly dismissed the appeal and disposed of all pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case