RAM SWAROOP vs MAHINDRU — C.A. No. 4459/1997

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010077801997

Filing Date

30-Apr-1997

Registration No

C.A. No. 4459/1997

Diary Number

7780/1997

Order Date

18-Dec-2003

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM SWAROOP

    Adv. MADHU MOOLCHANDANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHINDRU

    Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Dec-2003

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 30-Apr-1997

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4459/1997

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's judgment, holding that the defendants-appellants (Ram Swaroop and others) were entitled to the disputed property. The Court found that the widow Smt. Gangi validly transferred her inherited property to Bala Ram through a 1932 compromise deed executed under the local "illaqua" custom, which predated the Hindu Widow Remarriage Act's application to the area (effective 1950), making the Act inapplicable retrospectively. The Court also ruled the plaintiff's suit was barred by limitation, as he attained majority in 1956 but filed suit only in 1968, and his father had consented to the partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case