M/S. PIRAMAL PHARMA LIMITED vs GUJARAT POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD — SLP(C) No. 5600/2026

Case under Environmental Laws : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Indian Forest Act, 1927, Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, Biological Diversity Act 2002, Coastal Regulation Zone (Crz), Pollution Laws, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, All Other Acts, Rules, Regulations Dealing with Environment, Ecology, Conservation Including Environmental Clearance Section III-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010077752026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 5600/2026

Diary Number

7775/2026

Order Date

09-Feb-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Environmental Laws : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Indian Forest Act, 1927, Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, Biological Diversity Act 2002, Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), Pollution Laws, Prevention of cruelty to animals, all other Acts, Rules, Regulations dealing with environment, ecology, conservation including environmental clearance Section III-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. PIRAMAL PHARMA LIMITED

    Adv. MAHFOOZ AHSAN NAZKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GUJARAT POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5600/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court disposed of Piramal Pharma Limited's special leave petition challenging the Gujarat Pollution Control Board's closure order (issued after a tanker allegedly dumped spent hydrochloric acid in the Narmada canal) by directing the GPCB's Prescribed Authority to decide the petitioner's representation seeking revocation of the closure within one week after hearing. The petitioner retains the liberty to approach the National Green Tribunal, which shall decide any interim relief prayers within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case