BIKAS CHANDRA SWAIN vs STATE OF ODISHA — C.A. No. 3916/2026
Case under Service Laws : Promotion, Seniority, Payment of Salary, Bonus, Provident Fund, Service Benefits, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Pay Scales, Transfer Section XI-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010077672026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
C.A. No. 3916/2026
Diary Number
7767/2026
Order Date
25-Mar-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Disposed off
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIKAS CHANDRA SWAIN
Adv. SUBHASISH MOHANTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
24-Mar-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3916/2026
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead cases: C.A. No. 3904/2026; MA
I notice that the document you've provided appears to be a Supreme Court hearing record, but it seems to be incomplete and contains many case listings rather than a single coherent case summary. Let me provide information about what appears to be the main case based on the header information: Supreme Court Hearing Summary Case: Muslemin Mahammad & Others v. State of Odisha & Others (Civil Appeal No. of 2026, arising from SLP (C) No. 6943/2026) Court: Supreme Court of India, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Hearing Date: March 25, 2026 Key Outcome: 1. Delay condoned - The court granted condonation of delay in filing 2. Leave granted - Special leave petitions were admitted 3. Appeals dismissed/disposed - The court dismissed appeals filed by the State of Odisha while disposing of appeals by private persons in accordance with the High Court's directions Main Issue: The case relates to approximately 132 matters concerning eligibility for Grant-in-Aid benefits under the Odisha Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994. The central issue involves whether the decision in *State of Odisha v. Anup Kumar Senapati* creates an absolute bar to such claims, or whether benefits can be extended when recommendations were made before the GIA Order was repealed. Next Steps: The State authorities were directed to complete verification and pass appropriate orders within six months from the order date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts