PARMINDER KAUR @ P.P.KAUR @ SONI vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB POLICE DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER — Crl.A. No. 283/2011
Case under Section II-B. Status: Sclsc Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010077112010
Filing Date
10-Mar-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 283/2011
Diary Number
7711/2010
Order Date
28-Jul-2020
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2020 INSC 467
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARMINDER KAUR @ P.P.KAUR @ SONI
Adv. BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) DUSHYANT PARASHAR[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB POLICE DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Jul-2020
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
16-Jul-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2020
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
05-Mar-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
08-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
15-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar
-
02-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
11-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 283/2011
Case Summary: Parminder Kaur v. State of Punjab Court Decision: The Supreme Court acquitted Parminder Kaur, setting aside her conviction for procuring a minor girl (Section 366A IPC) and criminal intimidation (Section 506 IPC). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions in witness testimony, inadequate investigation, and failure to properly consider the defendant's alternative defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts