M/S. SH. BHARAT ASSOCIATES . vs STATE OF U.P. . — C.A. No. 6386/2005

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010077092003

Filing Date

09-Apr-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 6386/2005

Diary Number

7709/2003

Order Date

01-Apr-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SH. BHARAT ASSOCIATES .

    Adv. ANUPAM LAL DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. .

    Adv. NIRANJANA SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) GAURAV DHINGRA RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 17-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 08-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 27-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Apr-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6386/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 006386/2005 The Supreme Court allowed M/S. Shree Bharat Associates' appeals against the State of U.P., setting aside the High Court's dismissal of their writ petitions challenging the validity of the Section 6 land acquisition declaration and Section 11 award. The Court found the High Court failed to consider the appellants' primary contention regarding limitation in issuing these declarations. The matters were remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits, with a request for expeditious disposal within six months, while maintaining current possession status quo pending final resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case