SAYUKTA KUSHWAHA vs SANTOSH SINGH BHADAURIA — T.P.(Crl.) No. 134/2026

Case under Transfer Petitions : Criminal Transfer Petition Under Section 406 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 446 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section XVI-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010074822026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

T.P.(Crl.) No. 134/2026

Diary Number

7482/2026

Order Date

23-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Transfer Petitions : Criminal Transfer Petition under Section 406 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 446 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section XVI-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAYUKTA KUSHWAHA

    Adv. RITU RENIWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH SINGH BHADAURIA

    Adv. ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-1] ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-2] ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-3] ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-4] ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-5] ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-6]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. T.P.(Crl.) No. 134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court disposed of a transfer petition in a matrimonial dispute between Sayukta Kushwaha and Santosh Singh Bhadauria by accepting their amicable settlement dated 25.02.2026 under Article 142 of the Constitution. The Court quashed all seven pending civil and criminal cases across Delhi and Uttar Pradesh, including complaints under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498-A, 406, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. Key settlement terms include: mother retains permanent custody of their child Adhyayan with joint maintenance obligations, no alimony claims, and parties agreeing not to initiate future proceedings or post defamatory content against each other. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case