VIJAY YADAV @ MANISH YADAV vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — Crl.A. No. 1768/2026

Case under 1501Rb-criminal Law : Offences Against Women, Including Sexual Offences, Harassment, Domestic Violence, Dowry, Trafficking Etc.(slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence.) Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010072662026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1768/2026

Diary Number

7266/2026

Order Date

06-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1501RB-Criminal Law : Offences against women, including sexual offences, harassment, domestic violence, dowry, trafficking etc.(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence.) Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY YADAV @ MANISH YADAV

    Adv. ANKUR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

    Adv. ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1768/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court granted special leave and allowed appellant Vijay Yadav's criminal appeal against the State of Uttarakhand. The court suspended the sentence imposed by the trial court's judgment dated 11/13.08.2025 and ordered the appellant's release on bail subject to terms and conditions to be determined by the jurisdictional court. The court clarified its observations regarding bail were limited to that purpose and would not influence the High Court's decision on the appeal's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case