M/S ESSEL MINING AND INDUSTRIES LTD vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, VISHAKHAPATNAM — C.A. No. 2431/2026

Case under Indirect Taxation : Customs Act, Customs Tariff Act, Export, Import and Anti-dumping Duty Section XVII-A. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010071772026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

C.A. No. 2431/2026

Diary Number

7177/2026

Order Date

21-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Customs Act, Customs Tariff Act, Export, Import and Anti-Dumping duty Section XVII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S ESSEL MINING AND INDUSTRIES LTD

    Adv. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, VISHAKHAPATNAM

    Adv. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1]

Case History

  1. 21-May-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  2. 20-May-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2431/2026

  8. 02-Mar-2017
  9. 02-Mar-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  10. 02-Mar-2017
  11. 01-Feb-2017
  12. 01-Feb-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  13. 01-Feb-2017
  14. 22-Apr-2016
  15. 22-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  16. 22-Apr-2016
  17. 08-Feb-2016
  18. 08-Feb-2016
  19. 08-Feb-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  20. 08-Feb-2016
  21. 08-Feb-2016
  22. 20-Nov-2015
  23. 20-Nov-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  24. 20-Nov-2015
  25. 26-Oct-2015
  26. 26-Oct-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 26-Oct-2015
  28. 08-Sep-2015
  29. 08-Sep-2015
  30. 02-Sep-2015
  31. 02-Sep-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  32. 02-Sep-2015
  33. 09-Jul-2015
  34. 09-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  35. 09-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  36. 09-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  37. 09-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  38. 09-Jul-2015
  39. 15-Dec-2014
  40. 15-Dec-2014
  41. 12-Dec-2014
  42. 12-Dec-2014
  43. 12-Dec-2014
  44. 12-Dec-2014
  45. 11-Jul-2014
  46. 26-Aug-2013
  47. 16-Aug-2013
  48. 03-May-2013
  49. 19-Nov-2012
  50. 08-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 18-Feb-2011

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 9667 - 9669/2010

casestatus.in Summary

This comprehensive set of hearing records from the Supreme Court of India shows multiple customs-related civil appeals spanning from 2010-2026. Here's a summary of the proceedings: The records document a complex web of interrelated customs cases, primarily involving mining and minerals companies (Essel Mining, Vedanta/Sesa Goa, and others) against the Commissioner of Customs. Here are the key outcomes: Primary Orders from Recent Hearings (2026): 1. Civil Appeal 3336/2026 (SolarCraft Cleantech/Atha Mines): Notice issued and tagged with Civil Appeal 3057/2026. 2. Civil Appeal Diary 6857/2026 (Khatau Narbheram): Delay condoned, notice issued, and tagged with Civil Appeal Diary 70467/2025. 3. Civil Appeal 3057/2026 (Essel Mining): Notice issued and tagged with Civil Appeals 9667-9669/2010. Common Pattern Across Cases: - Multiple matters continuously consolidated and tagged together for combined hearing - Delays frequently condoned - Notices issued to respondents with return dates typically set 4-6 weeks ahead - All cases ultimately consolidated under the primary headings CA 9667-9669/2010 and CA 9844-9888/2010 Status: The cases remain in the admission/notice phase with ongoing procedural compliance. The court has directed all related matters to be heard together, suggesting consolidated legal arguments regarding similar customs duty assessment issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case