COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX DELHI vs M/S SOJITZ CORPORATION (THE THEN NISSHO IWAI CORP) MANAGING DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 3680 - 3681/2012
Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010071522012
Filing Date
28-Feb-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 3680 - 3681/2012
Diary Number
7152/2012
Order Date
13-Sep-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX DELHI
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S SOJITZ CORPORATION (THE THEN NISSHO IWAI CORP) MANAGING DIRECTOR
Adv. R. CHANDRACHUD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Sep-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
08-Sep-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
07-Sep-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
28-Jul-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi
-
21-Jul-2022
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi
-
20-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2014
ROPView PDF
-
23-Apr-2014
ROPView PDF
-
28-Feb-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3680 - 3681/2012
-
18-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: C.A. No. 4814/2009
On 15/07/2014, the Supreme Court Registrar heard Civil Appeals 3680-3681/2012 filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi against M/S Sojitz Corporation. The Court noted that the original record was received and the appellant's statement of case was filed, but the respondent failed to enter appearance despite proper service of notice. The matter was directed to be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts