HIS GRACE MATHEWS MAR EPIPHANIOS . vs K. JOSHUA . — SLP(C) No. 6033/2003

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010071282003

Filing Date

02-Apr-2003

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 6033/2003

Diary Number

7128/2003

Order Date

07-Jul-2009

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIS GRACE MATHEWS MAR EPIPHANIOS .

    Adv. M. P. VINOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K. JOSHUA .

    Adv. HIMINDER LAL P. V. DINESH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 29-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 08-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 08-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 18-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 18-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 14-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 18-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 29-Nov-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 02-Apr-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 6033/2003

casestatus.in Summary

In this Special Leave to Appeal petition challenging a Kerala High Court judgment from December 2002, the Supreme Court heard arguments from counsel for both His Grace Mathews Mar Epiphanios (petitioner) and K. Joshua (respondent) on 7 July 2009. The Court adjourned the matter by two weeks based on a letter circulated by petitioner's counsel, with no substantive order passed on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case