M. CHANDRE GOWDA vs DEPTY.COMNR.,BANGALORE RURAL DISTT. — C.A. No. 6217/2009
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010069792006
Filing Date
11-Mar-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 6217/2009
Diary Number
6979/2006
Order Date
07-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M. CHANDRE GOWDA
Adv. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEPTY.COMNR.,BANGALORE RURAL DISTT.
Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY LALITA KAUSHIK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
06-Feb-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
31-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
18-Jan-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
16-Jan-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
29-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
28-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
23-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
26-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6217/2009
Case Summary On 7 February 2018, the Supreme Court dismissed M. Chandre Gowda's appeal against the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Rural District, declining to interfere with the High Court's judgment. However, the Court granted the appellant liberty to file a civil suit within eight weeks without dismissal on limitation grounds, leaving all issues open for determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts