THE STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA HOME SECRETARY vs SEHRUDEEN @ SEHRU ETC — Crl.A. No. 2424/2010

Case under Section II-B. Status: SCLSC DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010069652006

SCLSC DISPOSED

Filing Date

11-Mar-2006

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2424/2010

Diary Number

6965/2006

Order Date

17-Nov-2022

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA HOME SECRETARY

Adv. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

Respondent(s)

SEHRUDEEN @ SEHRU ETC

Adv. ABHISTH KUMAR[R-2] B. SUNITA RAO

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH

17-Nov-2022

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

14-Sep-2022

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

31-Mar-2022

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

30-Mar-2022

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

29-Mar-2022

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

Orders

17-Nov-2022 ROP - of Main Case
14-Sep-2022 ROP - of Main Case
15-Sep-2014 ROP - of Main Case
15-Sep-2014 ROP - of Main Case
11-Jul-2014 ROP - of Main Case
10-Dec-2010 ROP - of Main Case
27-Sep-2010 ROP - of Main Case
01-Apr-2010 ROP - of Main Case
06-Jan-2010 ROP - of Main Case
11-Nov-2009 ROP - of Main Case
16-Sep-2009 ROP - of Main Case
31-Jul-2009 ROP - of Main Case
14-May-2009 ROP - of Main Case
23-Jul-2008 ROP - of Main Case
11-Mar-2008 ROP - of Main Case
23-Jan-2008 ROP - of Main Case
21-Nov-2007 ROP - of Main Case
06-Sep-2007 ROP - of Main Case
01-May-2007 ROP - of Main Case
09-Mar-2007 ROP - of Main Case
06-Feb-2007 ROP - of Main Case
09-Jan-2007 ROP - of Main Case
23-Nov-2006 ROP - of Main Case
24-Jul-2006 ROP - of Main Case
10-Apr-2006 ROP - of Main Case
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Haryana v. Sehrudeen @ Sehru (Crl.A. No. 2424/2010) The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Haryana's appeal challenging the High Court's acquittal of Sehrudeen and Har Prasad on 17 November 2022. The respondents had been convicted by the trial court for the 1997 murder of school lecturer Abdul Rahim during a robbery of Rs. 62,056 in salary funds, but the High Court acquitted them citing material deficiencies in prosecution evidence, including witness inability to identify assailants, uncertain ballistic evidence, delayed recovery of stolen notes (two weeks post-incident), and only Rs. 500 recovered from the accused. The Supreme Court found the High Court's conclusion was a reasonable view with no misreading of evidence or perversity, thus upholding the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case