RAJDARBAR ICONIC VENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED vs ANURAG RASTOGI — CONMT.PET.(C) No.

Case under Civil Law : Any Matter Arising Out of Civil Suit/proceedings, Which Is Not Covered in Any of the Above Categories Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010068732026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

CONMT.PET.(C) No.

Diary Number

6873/2026

Order Date

14-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : Any matter arising out of Civil suit/proceedings, which is not covered in any of the above categories Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJDARBAR ICONIC VENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. MANOHAR PRATAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANURAG RASTOGI

    Adv. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-7] RAHUL KHURANA[R-2] RAHUL KHURANA[R-6] SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-1] KRISHNA BALLABH THAKUR[R-8] KRISHNA BALLABH THAKUR[R-9] PRASHANT RAWAT[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 07-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No.

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court disposed of a contempt petition by Rajdarbar Iconic Venture Private Limited against Anurag Rastogi and others regarding allegedly unauthorized construction on disputed land in Gurugram. The Court held that an Appellate Authority erred in stalling a demolition order by citing pending arbitration proceedings, as statutory authorities' actions on illegal construction are independent of private disputes. The Court directed: (1) the Municipal Corporation to urgently file a writ petition in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana to challenge the stay on demolition; (2) the Arbitral Tribunal to expedite proceedings; and (3) the District Town Planner to proceed under applicable urban development laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case