M/S. MUTHA ASSOCIATES . vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . — C.A. No. 2853/2002
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010068612001
Filing Date
17-Apr-2001
Registration No
C.A. No. 2853/2002
Diary Number
6861/2001
Order Date
04-Jul-2013
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. MUTHA ASSOCIATES .
Adv. V. D. KHANNA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Adv. J. S. WAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ASHA GOPALAN NAIR SHIVAJI M. JADHAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jul-2013
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2001
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2853/2002
Case Summary: M/S. MUTHA ASSOCIATES v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (C.A. 2853/2002) The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging land acquisition proceedings for a Pune market yard extension. The court upheld the acquisition as valid, finding the appellants had raised challenges far too late (nearly 20 years after initial planning notification) and without merit. However, the court partially allowed appeals by former Revenue Minister Narayan Rane, reversing the High Court's finding of malafides while upholding that his withdrawal order violated natural justice principles and lacked proper publication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts