POOJA MANDAL vs SANJEEV — SLP(Crl) No. 2058/2014

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010067782013

Filing Date

26-Feb-2013

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 2058/2014

Diary Number

6778/2013

Order Date

11-Oct-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POOJA MANDAL

    Adv. VISHNU SHARMA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV

    Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-2] [Gr]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Oct-2017

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  4. 11-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 30-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 17-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 17-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 27-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 27-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 22-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 22-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 10-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 21-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 26-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 2058/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this Special Leave Petition heard on 11-10-2017, petitioner Pooja Mandal challenged a 2010 Delhi High Court order quashing criminal proceedings against respondent Sanjeev. Mandal alleged that after she made a statement leading to the quashing, she was abandoned and harassed by the respondent. The Supreme Court disposed of the petition, directing that Mandal is at liberty to move the High Court to examine her claims of post-statement harassment, and empowering the High Court to recall its earlier order if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case