PARAMASIVAM @ PARAMAN @ KOTTIYAN . vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU — Crl.A. No. 212/2001

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010067752000

Filing Date

19-Apr-2000

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 212/2001

Diary Number

6775/2000

Order Date

17-Sep-2002

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAMASIVAM @ PARAMAN @ KOTTIYAN .

    Adv. V. J. FRANCIS (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU

    Adv. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 31-Jul-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 19-Feb-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Nov-2000

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Apr-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 212/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 212/2001 Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's conviction order. Appellants Paramasivam and Parameswaran, convicted under Section 302 IPC (murder) for killing Raja on 26 October 1988, were ordered to be released immediately if not wanted in any other case. Key Reasoning: The Court found the circumstantial evidence insufficient to establish a complete chain linking the accused to the crime. While the High Court relied on witness PW6's identification of slippers and PW16's fingerprint evidence, the Supreme Court held that PW16's evidence was inadmissible (fingerprints taken without magistrate's order in violation of Section 5, Identification of Prisoners Act). PW6's credibility was questionable—claiming to identify slippers in brief mercury lamp light during a 1-2 minute auto stop was unreliable. Without these pillars, the remaining witnesses (PW1, PW2) merely established the accused left with the deceased but not the crime itself, leaving a fatal gap in the prosecution's chain of circumstantial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case