FATHIMA ASGAR ALI C. vs THE UNION OF INDIA — SLP(Crl) No. 3866/2026

Case under 1511Pre-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(matters Related to Parole/furlough/remission and Premature Release.) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010067512026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 3866/2026

Diary Number

6751/2026

Order Date

20-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511PRE-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(Matters related to Parole/Furlough/Remission and Premature release.) Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FATHIMA ASGAR ALI C.

    Adv. MRS. VIPIN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. SANCHIT GARGA[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  4. 18-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  6. 11-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 20-Apr-2026

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 3866/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 3866/2026 filed by Fathima Asgar Ali C. against the Union of India. However, the Court directed the state authority to reconsider the petitioner's claim in light of subsequently filed documents showing that some convicts were released on parole despite pending cases against them, and to decide the matter afresh within the framework of extant parole policy without being influenced by earlier orders. All pending applications have been disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case