FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA . vs GOPI BALLAV SARKAR . — C.A. No. 6034/2014
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010066882012
Filing Date
23-Feb-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 6034/2014
Diary Number
6688/2012
Order Date
04-Aug-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA .
Adv. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) AJIT PUDUSSERY[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOPI BALLAV SARKAR .
Adv. DANISH ZUBAIR KHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Aug-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Aug-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
-
02-Jun-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6034/2014
Summary: The Supreme Court of India dismissed Food Corporation of India's civil appeal on 04 August 2022, declining to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. Although the appeal was dismissed, the court kept the underlying question of law open for future consideration. Any pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts