KANTILAL AMBALAL PATEL (D) BY LRS. vs INDIRABEN RATILAL ADHIA . — SLP(C) No. 9746/2013

Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010066322013

Filing Date

26-Feb-2013

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 9746/2013

Diary Number

6632/2013

Order Date

21-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANTILAL AMBALAL PATEL (D) BY LRS.

    Adv. PUJA SHARMA[P-1] SADHANA SANDHU[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDIRABEN RATILAL ADHIA .

    Adv. ARUNA GUPTA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Nov-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  4. 13-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 30-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 27-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 24-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 21-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 06-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 12-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 26-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9746/2013

casestatus.in Summary

On 21-11-2017, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 9746/2013 challenging a Gujarat High Court judgment. The petitioner contested the maintainability of the respondent's appeal before the High Court, arguing the respondent (alleged purchaser) was improperly joined as a party. The Court disposed of the special leave petition, leaving all questions open for the High Court to decide on merit, and preserved the petitioner's right to approach the Supreme Court if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case