ADALAT PRASAD vs ROOPLAL JINDAL . — Crl.A. No. 91/2002

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010065482000

Filing Date

17-Apr-2000

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 91/2002

Diary Number

6548/2000

Order Date

25-Aug-2004

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADALAT PRASAD

    Adv. RANJAN MUKHERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROOPLAL JINDAL .

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Aug-2004

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Dec-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Nov-2000

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Apr-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 91/2002

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal (Crl.A. 91/2002) The Supreme Court rejected the appellant's challenge to the High Court's order restoring summons in a fraud case. The Court overruled its prior judgment in K.M. Mathew's case, holding that a magistrate cannot recall summons under section 204 CrPC on the accused's application after the preliminary examination stage (sections 200-202) is complete. The correct remedy for erroneous summons lies under section 482 CrPC, not section 203 CrPC, which applies only before summons issuance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case