M/S SRI SAI BHAVANI FRIED GRAMS INDUSTRIES vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH — C.A. No. 7718/2014

Case under Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (Vat), State Sales Tax Act Section XII-A. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010064762011

Filing Date

25-Feb-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 7718/2014

Diary Number

6476/2011

Order Date

19-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (VAT), State Sales Tax Act Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SRI SAI BHAVANI FRIED GRAMS INDUSTRIES

    Adv. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

    Adv. D. MAHESH BABU G. N. REDDY DEVINA SEHGAL[R-1] DEVINA SEHGAL[R-4] DEVINA SEHGAL[R-5] DEVINA SEHGAL[R-6]

Case History

  1. 19-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 19-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Registrar (J) - IV

  3. 08-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 30-Jul-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 30-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 24-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 10-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 17-Dec-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 17-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 18-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 25-Feb-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7718/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 007718/2014 On 19-07-2017, the Registrar heard the appeal by M/S Sri Sai Bhavani Fried Grams Industries against The State of Andhra Pradesh. The Court noted that while counsels failed to file statements of case within the statutory period, this was not mandatory under the amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. The matter was directed to be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case