RAMJI PANDEY (D) THR.LRS. . vs RAMESHWAR MALI (D) THR.LRS. . — SLP(C) No. 9703/2008
Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010064702008
Filing Date
04-Mar-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 9703/2008
Diary Number
6470/2008
Order Date
09-Sep-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMJI PANDEY (D) THR.LRS. .
Adv. P. K. JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESHWAR MALI (D) THR.LRS. .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9703/2008
On 09/09/2013, the Supreme Court of India dismissed the special leave petition filed by Ramji Pandey (through legal representatives) against the High Court of Allahabad's judgment dated 05/12/2007 in Second Appeal No. 72/1976. The petition, which included a prayer for interim relief, was dismissed after hearing counsel for both parties before a bench of Justices Chandramauli Kr. Prasad and Kurian Joseph. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts