VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTH. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY vs PATNANA SEETHARAMANJANEYULU . — C.A. No. 4188/2006
Case under Labour and Industrial Laws : Appointment, Retrenchment, Termination, Dismissal, Removal, Disciplinary Proceedings Against Labour/workmen Section III-A. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010064642004
Filing Date
22-Mar-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 4188/2006
Diary Number
6464/2004
Order Date
15-Sep-2006
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTH. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.PATNANA SEETHARAMANJANEYULU .
Adv. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA
Case History
-
15-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2004
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4188/2006
On 15/09/2006, the Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal to Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority against the High Court's judgment dated 26/12/2003. The Court directed the case be listed immediately after the Constitution Bench pronouncement in State of U.P. v. Jai Bir Singh [2005(5) SCC 1], and ordered that the interim order continue during appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts