VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTH. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY vs PATNANA SEETHARAMANJANEYULU . — C.A. No. 4188/2006

Case under Labour and Industrial Laws : Appointment, Retrenchment, Termination, Dismissal, Removal, Disciplinary Proceedings Against Labour/workmen Section III-A. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010064642004

Filing Date

22-Mar-2004

Registration No

C.A. No. 4188/2006

Diary Number

6464/2004

Order Date

15-Sep-2006

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Labour and Industrial Laws : Appointment, retrenchment, termination, dismissal, removal, disciplinary proceedings against labour/workmen Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTH. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATNANA SEETHARAMANJANEYULU .

    Adv. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

Case History

  1. 15-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 07-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Nov-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 01-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 30-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Sep-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 20-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 06-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 12-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 16-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 22-Mar-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4188/2006

casestatus.in Summary

On 15/09/2006, the Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal to Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority against the High Court's judgment dated 26/12/2003. The Court directed the case be listed immediately after the Constitution Bench pronouncement in State of U.P. v. Jai Bir Singh [2005(5) SCC 1], and ordered that the interim order continue during appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case