HINDUSTAN POLES CORPORATION vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA — C.A. No. 5572 - 5573/2000

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010064492000

Filing Date

15-Apr-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 5572 - 5573/2000

Diary Number

6449/2000

Order Date

27-Mar-2006

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HINDUSTAN POLES CORPORATION

    Adv. BINA GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA

    Adv. P. PARMESWARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2006

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5572 - 5573/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Hindustan Poles Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta Court Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the show-cause notices, holding that Hindustan Poles Corporation's process of joining steel welded pipes of different diameters does NOT constitute "manufacture" under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Key Reasoning: The Court concluded that: (1) the process does not change the basic identity or original character of M.S. Welded Pipes into a new marketable product; (2) the burden to prove manufacture rests on Revenue, which failed to discharge it; and (3) the Revenue cannot resort to residuary tariff entry (7308.90) when goods fall under specified entries (pipes under 7306.90). Mere joining of pipes through welding does not constitute manufacture under settled jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case