MANAGEMENT OF TAMILNADU STATE TRANS CORP vs P.RANGARAJ — C.A. No. 7868/2014

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010064252012

Filing Date

22-Feb-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 7868/2014

Diary Number

6425/2012

Order Date

10-Jul-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAGEMENT OF TAMILNADU STATE TRANS CORP

    Adv. R. AYYAM PERUMAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.RANGARAJ

    Adv. GAUTAM NARAYAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2014
  5. 28-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Jul-2013
  8. 18-Apr-2013
  9. 28-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 30-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Jul-2012
  12. 10-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-May-2012
  14. 27-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 12-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Feb-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7868/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 007868/2014 Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the Labour Court's order directing regularisation of services for retrenched workers, while upholding the reinstatement order. The Court held that a Labour Court cannot order service regularisation when adjudicating a retrenchment reference under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as regularisation was never a disputed issue before it. Key Finding: Merely completing 240 days of continuous service does not entitle an employee to regularisation; reinstatement following an illegal retrenchment only restores the employee's prior status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case