MANAGEMENT OF TAMILNADU STATE TRANS CORP vs P.RANGARAJ — C.A. No. 7868/2014
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010064252012
Filing Date
22-Feb-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 7868/2014
Diary Number
6425/2012
Order Date
10-Jul-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANAGEMENT OF TAMILNADU STATE TRANS CORP
Adv. R. AYYAM PERUMAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.P.RANGARAJ
Adv. GAUTAM NARAYAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2014
ROPView PDF
-
28-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
28-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
10-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7868/2014
Case Summary: C.A. No. 007868/2014 Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the Labour Court's order directing regularisation of services for retrenched workers, while upholding the reinstatement order. The Court held that a Labour Court cannot order service regularisation when adjudicating a retrenchment reference under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as regularisation was never a disputed issue before it. Key Finding: Merely completing 240 days of continuous service does not entitle an employee to regularisation; reinstatement following an illegal retrenchment only restores the employee's prior status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts