ALKHOO RAM vs NIHALI — C.A. No. 10415/2013

Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section IV. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010063982012

Filing Date

22-Feb-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 10415/2013

Diary Number

6398/2012

Order Date

05-Sep-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – matters arising out of suit for specific performance, declaration, injunction, possession or cancellation of deeds/documents Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALKHOO RAM

    Adv. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIHALI

    Adv. AFTAB ALI KHAN

Case History

  1. 16-Oct-2024

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  2. 03-Oct-2024

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol

  3. 05-Sep-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 05-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Feb-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10415/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 010415/2013 (Alkhoo Ram v. Nihali) Hearing Date: 05-09-2024 The Supreme Court (Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice R. Mahadevan) heard Civil Appeal No. 10415/2013 between Alkhoo Ram and Nihali. Appellant's counsel sought adjournment citing late upload of the cause list, preventing adequate preparation. The court granted the adjournment and scheduled the next hearing two weeks later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case