NATHU RAM SHARMA vs S. S. KUTLEHRIA — C.A. No. 9312 - 9313/2010
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010063752010
Filing Date
25-Feb-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 9312 - 9313/2010
Diary Number
6375/2010
Order Date
11-Aug-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATHU RAM SHARMA
Adv. YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
S. S. KUTLEHRIA
Adv. BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [Caveat] ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-25] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-3] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-24] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-23] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-22] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-2] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-1] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-1] BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-24] BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-23] BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-2] SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA[R-22] ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
Ordinary
Ordinary
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-Aug-2022 | Ordinary |
| 04-Aug-2022 | Ordinary |
| 18-Jul-2018 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 25-Apr-2018 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 06-Apr-2018 | Ordinary |
Orders in this case
Case Summary: Nathu Ram Sharma v. S.S. Kutlehria Outcome: Civil Appeals 9312-9313/2010 and 2349-2350/2011 were dismissed. The Court upheld the lower court's judgment that qualifying service for AMIE (diploma holder) engineers must be counted from the date they obtain the AMIE qualification, not before. The Court held that the State has authority to determine qualifying service requirements, not the courts. In Civil Appeal 5241-5242/2022, the Court partially allowed the appeal by setting aside observations in paragraphs 8-10 of the impugned order regarding misinterpretation of pay structure instructions dated 19.07.2013, clarifying that para 3 applied only to step-up pay issues. All parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts