INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. PRINCIPAL vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX — C.A. No. 9834 - 9837/2013

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010063592012

Filing Date

22-Feb-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 9834 - 9837/2013

Diary Number

6359/2012

Order Date

01-Sep-2022

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. PRINCIPAL

    Adv. KUNAL VERMA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    Adv. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Sep-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  4. 09-Dec-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  5. 27-Oct-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Oct-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli

  7. 25-Oct-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 25-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Apr-2012
  14. 23-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 22-Feb-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9834 - 9837/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court of Karnataka's judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration. The Court found that the High Court had relied on the Samsung Electronics precedent, which was later overruled by the Supreme Court in the Engineering Analysis Centre case, and failed to properly analyze the factual findings of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Next Steps: On remand, the High Court must re-examine the legal issues and questions, allowing both parties to raise all pleas including reliance on the Engineering Analysis Centre judgment and the Revenue's contentions regarding "Royalty" classification. The parties may also rely on any order passed in a pending related Review Petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case