INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. PRINCIPAL vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX — C.A. No. 9834 - 9837/2013
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010063592012
Filing Date
22-Feb-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 9834 - 9837/2013
Diary Number
6359/2012
Order Date
01-Sep-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. PRINCIPAL
Adv. KUNAL VERMA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Adv. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari
-
09-Dec-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
27-Oct-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli
-
25-Oct-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 9834 - 9837/2013
Case Summary: Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court of Karnataka's judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration. The Court found that the High Court had relied on the Samsung Electronics precedent, which was later overruled by the Supreme Court in the Engineering Analysis Centre case, and failed to properly analyze the factual findings of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Next Steps: On remand, the High Court must re-examine the legal issues and questions, allowing both parties to raise all pleas including reliance on the Engineering Analysis Centre judgment and the Revenue's contentions regarding "Royalty" classification. The parties may also rely on any order passed in a pending related Review Petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts