D.P.SURYAWANSHI . vs BAJAJ AUTO LTD. — SLP(C) No. 5850/2004

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010062692004

Filing Date

19-Mar-2004

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 5850/2004

Diary Number

6269/2004

Order Date

27-Sep-2004

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.P.SURYAWANSHI .

    Adv. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ AUTO LTD.

    Adv. MANIK KARANJAWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Sep-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Jun-2004
  4. 26-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Apr-2004
  6. 24-Mar-2004
  7. 19-Mar-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5850/2004

  8. 16-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 09-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 08-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 23-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 18-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 17-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 09-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 13-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 14-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 08-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 5850/2004 - D.P. Suryawanshi v. Bajaj Auto Ltd. On September 27, 2004, the Supreme Court disposed of SLP(C) 5850/2004 along with related petitions concerning employee transfers at Bajaj Auto Ltd. Employees challenged their postings across various states implemented under a consent order in Civil Appeal 4999/2002. The Court directed that within four weeks, counsel for the workers must provide the management with names and preferred locations for 47 workers (31 who took voluntary retirement and 16 vacancies available), to be adjusted in nearby Maharashtra or adjacent states. The Court emphasized that the management should sympathetically consider such representations in future and extended the undertaking until October 31, 2004, vacating it from November 1, 2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case