D.P.SURYAWANSHI . vs BAJAJ AUTO LTD. — SLP(C) No. 5850/2004
Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010062692004
Filing Date
19-Mar-2004
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 5850/2004
Diary Number
6269/2004
Order Date
27-Sep-2004
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D.P.SURYAWANSHI .
Adv. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.BAJAJ AUTO LTD.
Adv. MANIK KARANJAWALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Sep-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jun-2004
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2004
ROPView PDF
-
24-Mar-2004
ROPView PDF
-
19-Mar-2004
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5850/2004
-
16-Mar-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 5850/2004 - D.P. Suryawanshi v. Bajaj Auto Ltd. On September 27, 2004, the Supreme Court disposed of SLP(C) 5850/2004 along with related petitions concerning employee transfers at Bajaj Auto Ltd. Employees challenged their postings across various states implemented under a consent order in Civil Appeal 4999/2002. The Court directed that within four weeks, counsel for the workers must provide the management with names and preferred locations for 47 workers (31 who took voluntary retirement and 16 vacancies available), to be adjusted in nearby Maharashtra or adjacent states. The Court emphasized that the management should sympathetically consider such representations in future and extended the undertaking until October 31, 2004, vacating it from November 1, 2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts