SHAKUMBHARI STRAW PRODUCTS LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR S.K. RASTOGI vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (TAX AND REGISTRATION / INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE) THROUGH SECRETARY — C.A. No. 2807/2012

Case under Indirect Taxation : Entry Tax, Motor Vehicle Tax, Purchase Tax, Entertainment Tax, Terminal Tax, Octroi, Toll Tax, Professional Tax, Gold Control Act, Hotel Receipts Tax Act, Water and Sewage Tax, Luxury Tax, Cess Acts Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010062622012

Filing Date

21-Feb-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 2807/2012

Diary Number

6262/2012

Order Date

22-Jan-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Entry tax, motor vehicle tax, purchase tax, entertainment tax, terminal tax, octroi, toll tax, professional tax, Gold Control Act, Hotel Receipts Tax Act, Water and sewage Tax, luxury tax, Cess Acts Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAKUMBHARI STRAW PRODUCTS LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR S.K. RASTOGI

    Adv. SAURABH AJAY GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (TAX AND REGISTRATION / INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE) THROUGH SECRETARY

    Adv. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1] BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-2] BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Jan-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Jan-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 16-Jan-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Jul-2012

    ROPView PDF

  8. 21-Feb-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2807/2012

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 2807/2012 On January 22, 2024, the Supreme Court dismissed all appeals filed by Shakumbhari Straw Products Ltd. against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The Court found that subsequent to a 2017 order in Civil Appeal No. 997-998 of 2004, similar issues raised by other assessees had been litigated in the High Court without success, and related Special Leave Petitions had been dismissed. Finding nothing surviving in the appeals, the Court dismissed them accordingly. All pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case