RAJA RAM vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH THE HOME SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 253/2014

Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010060722010

Filing Date

23-Feb-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 253/2014

Diary Number

6072/2010

Order Date

17-Aug-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJA RAM

    Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH THE HOME SECRETARY

    Adv. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Aug-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  4. 10-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 03-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 25-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 25-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  14. 04-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-Jul-2015

    ROPView PDF

  17. 10-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  18. 10-Jul-2015

    ROPView PDF

  19. 29-Apr-2015

    ROPView PDF

  20. 20-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Mar-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 23-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 14-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 30-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 30-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 01-Aug-2014

    ROPView PDF

  27. 04-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 22-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 13-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 29-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 20-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 16-Aug-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 16-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 12-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 14-Jun-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 07-Jun-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 06-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 03-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 30-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 30-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  41. 02-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  42. 26-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 14-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 09-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 09-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 29-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 27-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 23-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 16-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 04-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 08-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 28-Mar-2011

    ROPView PDF

  53. 15-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 18-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  55. 11-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 03-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 14-Jan-2011

    ROPView PDF

  58. 29-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 25-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 23-Feb-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 253/2014

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 253 of 2014 Raja Ram and another appellant challenged a lower court judgment against the State of Uttar Pradesh. On August 17, 2017, a two-judge bench comprising Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer heard the appeals (including related appeals 249-252 of 2014) and found no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals without further directions or next steps indicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case