KHADHI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION vs SAROJINI DEVI . — C.A. No. 6443/2014
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010060072006
Filing Date
03-Mar-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 6443/2014
Diary Number
6007/2006
Order Date
08-Jul-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHADHI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION
Adv. MITTER & MITTER CO.
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAROJINI DEVI .
Adv. DINESH KUMAR GARG
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
11-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
12-Dec-2008
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jun-2008
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2006
ROPView PDF
-
08-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6443/2014
-
12-Dec-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 006443/2014 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Khadhi & Village Industries Commission against Sarojini Devi and others. The court set aside the High Court's judgment and the Industrial Tribunal's award that had directed reinstatement of daily wage workers terminated on 23rd May 1990 following an office fire. The court found the Tribunal failed to establish that workers had completed the mandated one year continuous service or 240 working days required under Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before retrenchment, and had not addressed the workers' significant delay in filing claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts