MURTI BHAWANI MATA MANDIR REP. THROUGH PUJARI (D) THROUGH LR KAILASH vs <font color='red'>RAMESH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.</font> — C.A. No. 880/2019

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010059162005

Filing Date

14-Mar-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 880/2019

Diary Number

5916/2005

Order Date

21-Jan-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2019 INSC 61

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURTI BHAWANI MATA MANDIR REP. THROUGH PUJARI (D) THROUGH LR KAILASH

    Adv. PRATIBHA JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.

    Adv. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1.1] ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1.2] ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1.3] ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1.4] ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1.6]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Jan-2019

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 21-Jan-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  5. 27-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 21-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 21-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 02-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 02-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 26-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 26-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 09-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 09-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 10-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 03-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 03-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 31-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 24-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 24-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 09-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 08-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 01-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 11-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 22-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 05-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 10-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 22-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 05-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 25-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 20-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 02-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 29-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 12-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 27-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 27-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 08-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 13-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 11-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 23-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 29-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 14-Mar-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 880/2019

  49. [ 2019 INSC 61 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Murti Bhawani Mata Mandir v. Rajesh The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's judgment dated December 3, 2004. The case involved a dispute over agricultural land where the temple sought a permanent injunction against interference with possession; the trial court dismissed the suit in 1981 for failure to prove possession. After dismissal, the respondent filed an application under Section 144 of the CPC seeking restoration of possession and mesne profits, which the court found inapplicable since no decree or order had been reversed or varied—Section 144 requires that restitution follow from variation or reversal of a decree, which did not occur here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case