SUBHASH CHANDER MANSOTRA . vs HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF J&K . — C.A. No. 1395/2002

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010059152000

Filing Date

05-Apr-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 1395/2002

Diary Number

5915/2000

Order Date

28-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH CHANDER MANSOTRA .

    Adv. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF J&K .

    Adv. RR-EX-PARTE TARA CHANDRA SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Apr-2009
  13. 01-Sep-2008
  14. 06-Jun-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Apr-2008
  16. 04-Dec-2006
  17. 01-Apr-2005
  18. 04-Mar-2005
  19. 09-Aug-2004
  20. 27-Apr-2004
  21. 17-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 13-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 11-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 23-Aug-2002
  25. 22-Apr-2002
  26. 19-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 11-Dec-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 08-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 10-Sep-2001
  30. 05-Apr-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1395/2002

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 1395/2002 (Subhash Chander Mansotra v. High Court of J&K) Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on March 28, 2014. Appellants challenged the High Court's judgment upholding a 1997 selection process for District and Sessions Judge positions under the Jammu & Kashmir Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1983, raising six contentions regarding constitutional classification, procedural compliance, and reservation policy. The Court found no merit in any challenge and held that appellants had no grievance against selected candidates, rendering the petition a public interest litigation in a service matter—which is impermissible. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case