DANIEL PREMACEY RAMBALL vs JOSEPH CHARLAS SALVI (D) BY LRS. . — C.A. No. 8892/2003

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010059142003

Filing Date

13-Mar-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 8892/2003

Diary Number

5914/2003

Order Date

12-Aug-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DANIEL PREMACEY RAMBALL

    Adv. A. S. BHASME (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOSEPH CHARLAS SALVI (D) BY LRS. .

    Adv. APARNA BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8892/2003

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 8892/2003 Daniel Premacey Ramball v. Joseph Charlas Salvi (D) by LRS & Anr. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Bombay High Court's March 11, 2002 judgment. The case involved two Wills executed by Maltibai in 1961 and 1969. The Court found the High Court had inadequately examined evidence regarding the 1969 Will's attesting witness (Philip Mathew) and remitted the matter to the Trial Court to reconsider the validity of both Wills based on relevant material. Respondent No. 2 was made a party; no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case